Parents are worried, and seek answers for family travel. Here are three items that illustrate the intense concern over new pat-down and scanner airport security measures.
1. A parent of 3 children had an airport pat-down question for travel reporters from the Bay Area News Group, in California. The answer, posted Nov. 28, 2010 on mercurynews.com, includes advice from TSA and information about best ways to comply with security measures.
The article, titled
"Travel Q&A: Helping children with new airport security measures", has a calm, matter-of-fact tone. The readers' comments, however, contain vociferous objections and well-spoken outcries about loss of personal freedoms and civil liberties and how wrong it is for a stranger to touch the 'privates' of anyone, let alone a child.
One reader included a version of Benjamin Franklin's oft paraphrased quote: "If we restrict liberty to attain security we will lose them both." (Or,
those who do that "deserve neither", depending on the quote version.)
2. Comparing security practices in Europe with those in the US, the Nov. 19th CBS News video, below, includes a comment from Chris Yates, an Aviation Security Expert: "Looking at the inner thighs, the buttocks, and so on, -- that is simply not something we would do or ever countenance here over this side of the Atlantic."
Titled
Foreign Airport Screenings "Less Intrusive", the video shows scanners being utilized in Europe, and describes newly developed scanners that do not show body details.
3. In her Nov. 18th blog post, Shelly Rivoli, mother of three children and author of
Travels with Baby, expresses concern about pat-downs, evaluates potential scanner radiation, and decides it is preferable to have her children scanned than to have them subjected to 'physical groping by a complete stranger'. She muses that crotch-sniffing dogs could detect more threats than scanners (with a few false positives), match scanners' invasion of privacy, and cost less.
Policies are changing, and the screening practices for children have already been modified. The debate and study continue.
Sandy Nielsen
Sleeps5.com